Картман
Активный участник
Ну раз пошла такая пьянка,, что же,, для себя жал до последнего, но думаю нужно внести некую лепту и моей команде в это, некогда альбертом была отписанна некая статья,, потом она очень тщательно потерлась везде,, у меня в принципе много разной инфы и от Мексиканцов и от Итальянцев и от американцев, но в данном случае я думаю всем имеет смысл обратить внимание именно на сие, иначе вас с порога не туда понесет и тупо потеряют все время, извините за мой плохой Французский, но как есть- The strategy itself is very simple: is a combination of 4 strategies: GRID TRADING, FIBONACCI, MARTINGALE and ANTIMARTINGALE.
It is MULTIDIMENSIONAL, and that is very clear when operations are. This strategy corners the market, move to where you move, generates money. Practically it generates money each 'minute' if there is volatility. It is based on numbers and not on technical analysis.
1 They are brokers of NFA, because this strategy is based on coverage and outside trips, since this strategy opens literally thousands of orders at the same time.
2. It is ideal to have the broker mini lots or even micro or nano.
3. You need a Broker that allows hundreds or thousands of limited orders earrings.
4. You need a Broker that allows EA to be possible MT4-5, and which can send signal in the order with the TP and SL included.
5 As does coverage with thousands of orders, we recommend a broker that does not have a swap, although this does not affect virtually nothing to the end result of the strategy.
6. It is recommended that the broker is ECN or NDD, or basically to cover their positions because a market maker not you hold or 1 month. Also, it is recommended that the broker have fixed spread, since there are brokers ECN where bid moves different to ask, eg the bid for 5 ticks and the ask has been stopped, this could affect a little the margin, since the perfect coverage is done when the ask has also moved. Although you will not reach too really affect, only that is not "perfect"
7 Leverage 100 or more.
Grid trading problem: Lost in trend.
FIBONACCI:
Sequence 1: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89
Sequence 2: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377
Sequence 3: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584
The first to some volatile markets (usd/jpy) the second for markets more volatile (eur/usd) the third for very volatile markets (gbp/jpy) use long markets sequences few volatile is absurd, since the operations can last months open.
4. MARTINGALE:
The Martingale, a strategy used in Casinos, in its version for Forex. The problem of this strategy in the Casinos there is a table limit, while Forex does not exist that limit, and can always win with high security, provided that the account has the sufficient size.
Probably one of the most popular progressions is the martingale. In this system we increased the size of the lots after a loss, the old "double or nothing". We continue to increase the lots until gain, is generated at that time, we start with the minimum lot.
At that point, we start the progression again. There are some probabilistic differences Forex compared to the Casino, one of them is detecting a trend, we have easier likelihood of obtaining a profit, i.e., is extremely difficult do more of 7 or 8 negative trades followed, something that in a Casino can occur until more than 13 runs to get the benefit.
Being a progression strategy, you need enough volume account to be sure not to leave the market, and to comply with the strategy.
The problem of progressions strategies comes after many runs of consecutive losses, since having to increase the size of the lots or ranges of pips, increasingly need more money on guarantees for the broker.
5 ANTIMARTINGALA:
To the contrary to the martingale, this makes progression in the gusts of profits.
The Antimartingale problem: lost in markets small lateral movement or setbacks, therefore one of the problems is to know when to stop and take profits without continue to do progressions, 2 years cost me this final.
THE USE THAT YOU GIVE
1 GRID:
I used to corner the market and not let a site where to move.
2 MARTINGALE:
I used to make to immortal and winning Grid.
3 ANTIMARTINGALA:
I used to not ruin me with the martingale if it greatly increases the progressions, you try to search a full hedge, reducing the margin to the minimum possible, increasing the amount of orders that are you can put and therefore performance. It is not identical to the reverse of the martingale; they operate as "separate system"
4 FIBO
Its sequence I used to size the grid from the Grid, as well as to calculate different dimensions martingale progressions, trying to improve what could be achieved with one series of numbers. This new dimension increases over 30% profits and decreases at least one 30% floating losses.
Grid + martingale: this combination winner returns to the Grid, already not always lose in trends, but now will win on side, and will win in cuts that trend. Also returns more profitable to the basic martingale, since less travel pips to close an order is needed and therefore there is more closed operations with more gain, and reduced risk of large progressions.
Grid + Antimartingale:
This combination becomes winner to the Grid, which earns more on side, and in addition also trend. But should be combined or alone, due to the use I give to the antimartingale, would not win enough.
Fibonacci + Grid:
This multiplies the number of orders exponentially, reducing risk, increasing benefits, and creating hundreds of different grids in the same market
Fibonacci + Antimartingale: this I so keep it took much time thinking about it. Basically try to keep the antimartingale a close to 0 margins
Grid + Grid: HedgeGrid
This turns the Grid getting perfect in purchases and sales coverage, since the system operates on both sides of the market. Actually the strategy Grid never can be added to a Grid strategy, it is absurd, but thus it is understood that it operates both purchases and sales.
IN SUMMARY:
CATCHES A GRID, MARTINGALEALO, EXPANDELO (MULTIPLICALO) SEVERAL TIMES WITH A NUMBER OF THE FIBO SEQUENCE, AND PUT THE ANTIMARTINGALA TO NOT SUFFER FOR LACK OF MONEY.
If we take the Fibo 55 sequence, the system leaves a limit order 55 points above the order recently opened, so that if there is a jump of more than 110 pips in a tick, you can lose the progression and destabilize the system. The system takes up open to continuing the progression orders, is smart because you can calculate the loss that has and note if there is a gap, then adjusts the martingale with a new figure, or closed positions and starts a new martingale that lost the previous loss. Therefore, that use sequences of short term can put at risk the stability in news, but system recovers from this, although it takes several seconds to react to so many orders that must be modified. One solution is to every order to allow implementations about 3 or 6 of the following progressions on limited orders, which mean greater collapse of shipping of orders, and complaining about insurance broker.
To put a system in EUR/USD with the "complete" Fibo sequence, required 11 sequences of 2 sets (martingale + antimartingala) x 2 sides (long and short), until 44 active EAs for a market only, with 1 minimum 24 (22 martingales + 2 antimartingala)
It is MULTIDIMENSIONAL, and that is very clear when operations are. This strategy corners the market, move to where you move, generates money. Practically it generates money each 'minute' if there is volatility. It is based on numbers and not on technical analysis.
1 They are brokers of NFA, because this strategy is based on coverage and outside trips, since this strategy opens literally thousands of orders at the same time.
2. It is ideal to have the broker mini lots or even micro or nano.
3. You need a Broker that allows hundreds or thousands of limited orders earrings.
4. You need a Broker that allows EA to be possible MT4-5, and which can send signal in the order with the TP and SL included.
5 As does coverage with thousands of orders, we recommend a broker that does not have a swap, although this does not affect virtually nothing to the end result of the strategy.
6. It is recommended that the broker is ECN or NDD, or basically to cover their positions because a market maker not you hold or 1 month. Also, it is recommended that the broker have fixed spread, since there are brokers ECN where bid moves different to ask, eg the bid for 5 ticks and the ask has been stopped, this could affect a little the margin, since the perfect coverage is done when the ask has also moved. Although you will not reach too really affect, only that is not "perfect"
7 Leverage 100 or more.
Grid trading problem: Lost in trend.
FIBONACCI:
Sequence 1: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89
Sequence 2: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377
Sequence 3: 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34, 55, 89, 144, 233, 377, 610, 987, 1597, 2584
The first to some volatile markets (usd/jpy) the second for markets more volatile (eur/usd) the third for very volatile markets (gbp/jpy) use long markets sequences few volatile is absurd, since the operations can last months open.
4. MARTINGALE:
The Martingale, a strategy used in Casinos, in its version for Forex. The problem of this strategy in the Casinos there is a table limit, while Forex does not exist that limit, and can always win with high security, provided that the account has the sufficient size.
Probably one of the most popular progressions is the martingale. In this system we increased the size of the lots after a loss, the old "double or nothing". We continue to increase the lots until gain, is generated at that time, we start with the minimum lot.
At that point, we start the progression again. There are some probabilistic differences Forex compared to the Casino, one of them is detecting a trend, we have easier likelihood of obtaining a profit, i.e., is extremely difficult do more of 7 or 8 negative trades followed, something that in a Casino can occur until more than 13 runs to get the benefit.
Being a progression strategy, you need enough volume account to be sure not to leave the market, and to comply with the strategy.
The problem of progressions strategies comes after many runs of consecutive losses, since having to increase the size of the lots or ranges of pips, increasingly need more money on guarantees for the broker.
5 ANTIMARTINGALA:
To the contrary to the martingale, this makes progression in the gusts of profits.
The Antimartingale problem: lost in markets small lateral movement or setbacks, therefore one of the problems is to know when to stop and take profits without continue to do progressions, 2 years cost me this final.
THE USE THAT YOU GIVE
1 GRID:
I used to corner the market and not let a site where to move.
2 MARTINGALE:
I used to make to immortal and winning Grid.
3 ANTIMARTINGALA:
I used to not ruin me with the martingale if it greatly increases the progressions, you try to search a full hedge, reducing the margin to the minimum possible, increasing the amount of orders that are you can put and therefore performance. It is not identical to the reverse of the martingale; they operate as "separate system"
4 FIBO
Its sequence I used to size the grid from the Grid, as well as to calculate different dimensions martingale progressions, trying to improve what could be achieved with one series of numbers. This new dimension increases over 30% profits and decreases at least one 30% floating losses.
Grid + martingale: this combination winner returns to the Grid, already not always lose in trends, but now will win on side, and will win in cuts that trend. Also returns more profitable to the basic martingale, since less travel pips to close an order is needed and therefore there is more closed operations with more gain, and reduced risk of large progressions.
Grid + Antimartingale:
This combination becomes winner to the Grid, which earns more on side, and in addition also trend. But should be combined or alone, due to the use I give to the antimartingale, would not win enough.
Fibonacci + Grid:
This multiplies the number of orders exponentially, reducing risk, increasing benefits, and creating hundreds of different grids in the same market
Fibonacci + Antimartingale: this I so keep it took much time thinking about it. Basically try to keep the antimartingale a close to 0 margins
Grid + Grid: HedgeGrid
This turns the Grid getting perfect in purchases and sales coverage, since the system operates on both sides of the market. Actually the strategy Grid never can be added to a Grid strategy, it is absurd, but thus it is understood that it operates both purchases and sales.
IN SUMMARY:
CATCHES A GRID, MARTINGALEALO, EXPANDELO (MULTIPLICALO) SEVERAL TIMES WITH A NUMBER OF THE FIBO SEQUENCE, AND PUT THE ANTIMARTINGALA TO NOT SUFFER FOR LACK OF MONEY.
If we take the Fibo 55 sequence, the system leaves a limit order 55 points above the order recently opened, so that if there is a jump of more than 110 pips in a tick, you can lose the progression and destabilize the system. The system takes up open to continuing the progression orders, is smart because you can calculate the loss that has and note if there is a gap, then adjusts the martingale with a new figure, or closed positions and starts a new martingale that lost the previous loss. Therefore, that use sequences of short term can put at risk the stability in news, but system recovers from this, although it takes several seconds to react to so many orders that must be modified. One solution is to every order to allow implementations about 3 or 6 of the following progressions on limited orders, which mean greater collapse of shipping of orders, and complaining about insurance broker.
To put a system in EUR/USD with the "complete" Fibo sequence, required 11 sequences of 2 sets (martingale + antimartingala) x 2 sides (long and short), until 44 active EAs for a market only, with 1 minimum 24 (22 martingales + 2 antimartingala)
